(There were reports of major online issues, but those seem to have been cleared up.)ĭungeon Hunter: Alliance is the only declared candidate in the race these days, so in that respect it scores quite a few points. They’re small, but noticeable, issues, and you hope that a game with so little character could at least be polished. Your inventory will glitch up and show that your HP-boosting ring is a two-handed mace with bonus fire damage. Players occasionally get stuck for a few seconds on obstacles. With the occasional exception, though, the item curve is rather shallow, so one guy will get a Spectral Staff with bonus mana regeneration and HP regeneration, and the other will be stuck with… a Spectral Staff with the same attack and fewer bonuses.
Now each class can be customized with skills and such so that they don’t play identically, but the armor and weapon drops are clearly tailored for one class, and two players basically have to split the good stuff. Still, it’s a welcome addition.) There seems to be one big oversight, though: for a game with four players, it’s weird to have three character classes. (This seems to really only work if all start at once, as otherwise you have to complete the exact same quests on your own before joining up. You can join a host anywhere during his game, and if your quests line up, you can also progress on your own file. Loot is randomly assigned a player color and only that person can pick it up, which keeps things even, and you can drop items with similar restrictions to keep a greedy player from messing up exchanges. Online is seamless as usual, and local does a good job of screen management, allowing all four players to access pop-up menus at once, LittleBigPlanet-style. Okay, so the important stuff: Alliance supports four-player co-op, both online and local. This is fine to just skip conversations in multiplayer, but a better-written tale would have mitigated the monotony when playing alone. Just don’t! It’s not very fun, as it’s deep enough for a phone game but pales in comparison to other PS3 offerings. Just don’t expect to be impressed, as we think our old Champions disc has comparable visuals. Thankfully, things are zoomed out enough that it’s not a problem, and the menus have that Torchlight-style low-budget-but-still-slick look to them. The areas are all somewhat recycled from iOS versions, and they have low polygon counts. We get that it’s supposed to be less daunting, but this game’s demographic should really be okay with a Dual Shock at this point. It is something you should ignore, since pointing with the Move to move and hitting the Move button for almost everything isn’t actually easier or more precise in any way. This version adds multiplayer, and that’s the ingredient it really needed.įirst, though, let’s go over the other features.
In other words, it’s Dark Alliance without the IP.
Dungeon hunter alliance ps3 co op upgrade#
Along the way you level up, gain skills and upgrade attributes. You choose a class, enter dungeons, gather loot and complete objectives. The game’s based, as it always is with Gameloft, on a mobile title. It’s in this environment that Gameloft, the cover band of the industry, has a real shot with Dungeon Hunter: Alliance. (Is it the emergence of MMOs? Genre fatigue? Just an unfortunate sequence of studio closures? We don’t know.) There hasn’t been a Baldur’s Gate: Dark Alliance, a Champions of Norrath or even a decent Gauntlet out in years.
Dungeon hunter alliance ps3 co op ps2#
We don’t mean that in a bad way the genre just hasn’t seen the flurry of releases on the latest consoles that it had in the PS2 days. At this point, a co-op dungeon crawler seems like a relic of generations past.
0 kommentar(er)
